sciencevega-logo
sciencevega-logo

Concept   |   Meet the Editor   |   Publications   |   Support



Biochar reduces the risks of DDT-contaminated soil

by | Jan 21, 2025 | Earth Science

Biochar binds DDT effectively, so that the toxin is not taken up by soil organisms. Credit: Anja Enell, the Swedish Geotechnical Institute.

New research from Sweden has found that DDT soil pollution, still a major problem in many parts of the world, can be offset by biochar.

The researchers have developed a new method to manage ecological risks from the toxin by binding it with biochar.

When they mixed biochar into contaminated soil at a former tree nursery, DDT uptake by earthworms in the soil was halved.

This method may enable the growing of certain crops on land that is currently considered unusable due to the environmental risks.

The legacy of previous generations´ use of the insecticide DDT still affects us today.

During the 1950s and 60s, the substance was used to control pests in forestry and agriculture, and although it has been banned for over 50 years, in Sweden alone there are thousands of sites where the soil is still DDT-contaminated.

Many other countries around the world have the same problem.

The toxin has been linked to a variety of negative health effects in humans and animals, and it breaks down very slowly.

It poses an ecological risk because it can be taken up by terrestrial organisms such as earthworms.

When these are in turn eaten by birds and other animals, DDT begins to accumulate within the food chain, which means that the top predators are affected by the highest toxin concentrations.

For three years, researchers at Chalmers University of Technology have been testing a new method to reduce the ecological risks of the toxin, at a DDT-contaminated former tree nursery in southern Sweden.

“In our field experiment, we mixed the soil with biochar and grew different plants. We found that biochar binds DDT efficiently, so that it is not taken up by soil organisms,” says Paul Drenning, postdoctoral researcher at the Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering at Chalmers, and the first author of the study.

The researchers dug out soil, put it in piles and mixed biochar into half of them. They then set up 24 experimental plots and distributed the soil piles to them in a randomized experiment. The results later showed that the amount of DDT taken up by earthworms in the soil decreased by an average of 50% when the soil had been mixed with biochar. Credit: COWIfonden.

Cheap and environmentally friendly solution on site

Biochar – which is similar to charcoal – is an environmentally friendly product that is cheap to produce. It binds contaminants and can improve soil health when added to soil.

This practice can also be useful for climate change mitigation since it can contribute to long-term storage of carbon in the soil.

The researchers found that the amount of DDT taken up by earthworms in the soil decreased by an average of 50% when the soil had been mixed with biochar.

This indicates that the bioavailability of DDT to soil organisms had been reduced – meaning that the soil had become less toxic, with a lower risk of DDT spread via bioaccumulation in the food chain of animals, or by leaching into water.

This reduction in environmental risks could, in turn, lead to landowners being able to start farming again on land that is currently unused, pending decisions on how to manage the contaminated soil.

Drenning said: “Treating contaminated soil in large volumes is costly and complicated.

“A common solution is to dig out the soil and then transport it to a landfill for hazardous waste, but that means destroying good quality soils and is not a reasonable solution for large contaminated areas.

“Treatment with biochar on site could thus make the land useful instead of being left uncultivated or degraded, and also at a significantly lower cost for both the landowner and for the environment.”

Long-term effect expected

Examples of crops that could be grown in the treated area are saplings of pine and spruce, hay for animal feed or bioenergy crops such as willow trees (salix).

The treatment with biochar means that plants may take up less DDT from the soil as well, but they accumulate very little even without treatment.

Project lead Jenny Norrman, professor at the Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, said: “The reason why the contaminated land is left unused today is not that there would be health risks with crops, but that the landowner is obliged by regulation to address the ecological risks with DDT.

“While awaiting an investigation and decision on this, the land has remained unused.”

Biochar decomposes very slowly in soil, and the researchers expect the effect of the treatment to last for a long time – perhaps for decades. They will continue sampling at the site for several years to follow the development.

In parallel, they will explore how to scale up the experiment, to be able to mix biochar into the soil without having to dig out large volumes.

Great potential

Using biochar for treatment of contaminated soil is uncommon today. As far as the researchers know, the method has not been tested before at forest nurseries in Sweden, or internationally in the same soil type and climate.

Drenning said: “There is a great interest in using biochar for stabilisation of both DDT and various other contaminants in soils, such as metals and polyaromatic hydrocarbons.

“Therefore, it is positive that we have been able to see a good effect in our experiment.”

The study is published in Science of The Total Environment.

Share This…

Today’s Science – Tomorrow’s Scientists

ABOUT US

ScienceVega and its accompanying website, sciencevega.com, exist to bring today’s science to tomorrow’s scientists. And it will do this in a way which is completely free to both school and pupil. The pathway from GCSE to A-level to degree to scientific career is not always obvious. Quite often it is ambiguous and not enough is done to show a fourteen-year-old the possibilities open to them in a decade’s time.

Many may harbour the vague idea of ‘saving the whales’, but how many know how to get there? How many realise that as they go along their focus might change? The draw of the ocean may remain, but how many realise that instead of studying whales, they actually add to our knowledge of disappearing corals in the Pacific Ocean? Or the marked drop off in populations of crustaceans unique to Western Australia? Or examining fish behaviours in the Indian Ocean? But those careers are there and ScienceVega will showcase them, along with the scientists, both established professors at the top of their field and young PhD scientists just starting out on their career paths.

Should you wish to advertise with us, and help this venture to continue to reach our young scientists, please contact: office@sciencevega.com

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.