The study’s co-authors Argel Horton and Laura Arton apply the chlorine paste to a large coral (Orbicella annularis). The bright white area is where the treatment has already been applied. Image: Dr Graham Forrester.

A mixture of chlorine and cocoa butter could protect corals from disease and decrease antibiotic pollution of the oceans.

Researchers found that the mixture is effective at treating diseased corals, which could reduce negative side effects of antibiotic treatments on ocean ecosystems

In the tropical Atlantic, stony coral tissue loss disease (SCTLD) is particularly severe because the disease is transmitted quickly, spreads to many hosts, and results in high mortality rates.

Treatment methods to stop the spread of SCTLD are available; the most common is the use of antibiotics. This, however, comes with side effects like increased antibiotic resistance.

Now, an international team of researchers has investigated if an alternative, antibiotic-free approach to treating infected corals could help avoid antibiotic pollution of the world’s oceans and improve coral health.

Senior author of the study Dr Greta Aeby, a researcher at Qatar University, said: “Our study shows that direct treatment of SCTLD can help corals survive a disease outbreak and highlights that active management of disease is possible in the field.

“Antibiotic pollution is a problem worldwide, so we’re working to develop a non-antibiotic treatment that would slow down tissue loss diseases.”

Antibiotics vs chlorine

The researchers compared the effectiveness of different treatments by applying them to infected corals of Horseshoe Reef, near the British Virgin Islands.

Some corals were treated with amoxicillin, an antibiotic; others were treated with a paste mixed from chlorine and cocoa butter.

Aeby said: “In this mix, the active ingredient is sodium hypochlorite, an antiseptic commonly used to kill bacteria or viruses. 

“The chlorine powder we used in our treatment is the same used to kill germs in swimming pools. The cocoa butter was just the delivery mechanism allowing us to spread the chlorine on the coral lesions.”

The researchers applied both treatments directly to corals and re-visited the reef every four or five weeks to measure and describe lesions and to reapply the treatment as necessary.

After roughly 80 days, the median percentage of tissue lost was 17.6% for chlorine-treated colonies and 1.7% for amoxicillin-treated colonies.

Environmentally friendly

While the antibiotic treatment was more successful at containing SCTLD, the researchers said that unwanted side effects, such as the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, could be lessened when opting for the chlorine treatment.

Antibiotic-resistant bacteria do not only affect corals, they said.

Aeby explained: “Any organism – crabs, fish, even humans – in that same environment has a higher risk of encountering bacteria that are now antibiotic-resistant.”

While antibiotic treatments greatly impact the environment, the chlorine and cocoa butter paste mixture biodegrades easily, and the chlorine naturally deactivates within a day.

An added benefit is that it is much cheaper to produce – ingredients can be found in drug and hardware stores.

Co-author Argel Horton, a marine biologist at the Ministry of Environment, Natural Resources and Climate Change of the British Virgin Islands, said: “The antibiotic paste is not only tedious to produce, it also is often too expensive for conservationists, who operate with minimal funding on Caribbean islands.”

Protecting oceans vital to coral health

The researchers said that not all corals responded equally well to the treatments. There also are many more coral species in different regions that haven’t been included in the study.

They hope that future research will test the effectiveness of different treatment methods elsewhere.

Aeby said: “Disease treatment can help manage a disease, but it will not remove the disease from the coral populations.”

Direct treatments can decrease the pathogen load in the environment, but treating coral colonies like that done in the study – individually and by hand – is not feasible in the long term or on a large scale.

She added: “The best strategy would be to improve environmental conditions so that corals have a better chance of fighting disease themselves.

“This includes cleaning up water pollution and rebalancing the ecosystem.”

The study is published in Frontiers in Marine Science.