sciencevega-logo
sciencevega-logo

Concept   |   Meet the Editor   |   Publications   |   Support



Wind turbines impact bats’ access to water

by | Jan 17, 2025 | Earth Science

Small water bodies and wind turbines in the agricultural landscape. Credit: Photo by Jon A Juarez/ Leibniz-IZW.

Wind turbines in agricultural landscapes are increasingly impairing bats’ access to water bodies, according to new research.

Bats depend on open bodies of water such as small ponds and lakes for foraging and drinking. Access to water is particularly important for survival in the increasingly hot and dry summers caused by climate change, the time when female bats are pregnant and rear their young.

A scientific team from the Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research (Leibniz-IZW) has now shown that access to drinking sites is hampered by wind turbines in agricultural landscapes: many bat species avoid the turbines and water bodies located close to the turbines for several kilometres.

In order to counteract climate change, many countries are investing in the expansion of wind energy production in order to reduce greenhouse gases such as CO2 through renewable electricity.

However, the expansion of wind power production may also have negative consequences for wildlife and their habitats. This can potentially lead to some wildlife species being less able to cope with global warming.

Professor Dr Christian Voigt and Dr Carolin Scholz from the Leibniz-IZW and Hannah Klein from the University of Potsdam showed in a scientific investigation of the acoustic activity of bats in agricultural landscapes that many bat species are displaced by wind turbines near smaller bodies of water.

They analysed the spatial behaviour of bats belonging to the three functional guilds of open space foraging bats (that hunt above fields or the canopy of forests), narrow space foraging bats (that hunt in dense vegetations, for example below the forest canopy) and edge space foraging bats (that are specialised in foraging in transition zones such as forest edges).

Voigt said: “We were able to clearly recognise that those bats which specialized to forage in the open space and in dense vegetation avoided water bodies when wind turbines were located near them.

“Only species of the guild of edge space foraging bats are apparently not driven away from the water sites by the wind turbines.”

Glacial history

The scientists placed acoustic detectors at a total of 59 small ponds that are permanently filled with water at distances of around 50 to 5,000 metres from wind turbines in northern Brandenburg, a federal state in eastern Germany.

Owing to its glacial history, the study area has more than a thousand of these small ponds, called kettle holes, kettle lakes, or pothole lakes, which fulfil important ecological functions even in the intensively used agricultural landscape.

Scholz said: “During the reproductive season in July, we measured the acoustic activity of bats at bodies of water at different distances from wind turbines.

“We paid attention to compare the data for similar conditions, such as a lack of rain and moderate winds.

“In July, the lactation period of female bats slowly comes to an end and the young are weaned from the nursery roosts, which is an energetically strenuous phase for female bats.

“In addition, many waterholes dry up in midsummer, which is why the bats may be more dependent on small bodies of water that contain water all year round.”

Tragedy

The team identified a total of almost 8,400 calls of different bat species in the three bat guilds of open space hunters, narrow space hunters and edge spacer foragers.

The authors summarised: “With increasing proximity to wind turbines, the activity of open space foraging bats at water bodies decreased by 53% and the activity of bat species adapted to hunting in narrow vegetation decreased by 63%.”

The same picture was revealed when analysing the foraging behaviour that can be identified by the acoustic detectors: It decreased by 87% and 76% respectively as the distance to a wind turbine decreased from five kilometres to virtually zero.

Voigts said: “There is a certain tragedy in these results, because a measure to mitigate climate change has the unfortunate side effect that certain bats are less able to cope with hot and dry summers if they are displaced from their habitats by wind turbines.

“This emphasises once again how important it is to carefully consider the siting of wind turbines so as not to play off different objectives against each other.

“Habitats that are very important for species conservation should be given low priority or entirely excluded as sites for wind energy production.”

The bat species studied include the common pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pipistrellus), the soprano pipistrelle (Pipistrellus pygmaeus) and the western barbastelle (Barbastella barbastellus) as representatives of edge space foraging bats, species of the genera noctule bats (Nyctalus), house bats (Eptesicus) and vesper bats (Vespertilio) as representatives of open space foraging bats, and species of the genus mouse-eared bats (Myotis) and long-eared bats (Plecotus) as representatives of narrow space foraging bats.

Bats are protected species under German nature conservation law and EU law and should also be specially protected as migratory species.

This protection is conflicting with the expansion of wind energy production, because there are a significant number of direct fatalities at the turbines and the habitats of bats are impaired in many ways.

Voigt’s team at the IZW has been conducting research into this ‘green-green conflict’ between wind power expansion and bat conservation for many years.

The results are published in Biological Conservation.

Share This…

Today’s Science – Tomorrow’s Scientists

ABOUT US

ScienceVega and its accompanying website, sciencevega.com, exist to bring today’s science to tomorrow’s scientists. And it will do this in a way which is completely free to both school and pupil. The pathway from GCSE to A-level to degree to scientific career is not always obvious. Quite often it is ambiguous and not enough is done to show a fourteen-year-old the possibilities open to them in a decade’s time.

Many may harbour the vague idea of ‘saving the whales’, but how many know how to get there? How many realise that as they go along their focus might change? The draw of the ocean may remain, but how many realise that instead of studying whales, they actually add to our knowledge of disappearing corals in the Pacific Ocean? Or the marked drop off in populations of crustaceans unique to Western Australia? Or examining fish behaviours in the Indian Ocean? But those careers are there and ScienceVega will showcase them, along with the scientists, both established professors at the top of their field and young PhD scientists just starting out on their career paths.

Should you wish to advertise with us, and help this venture to continue to reach our young scientists, please contact: office@sciencevega.com

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.