This 2018 artist’s concept shows what the TRAPPIST-1 planetary system may look like, based on available data about the planets’ diameters, masses and distances from the host star (far left). New research shows that while TRAPPIST-1b, second from the left, has no atmosphere, TRAPPIST-1e, third from the right, could have a long-term stable atmosphere. Credit: NASA/ JPL-Caltech. Public Domain.

NASA’s Webb raises the possibility that we could detect signs of life on exoplanets; planets outside of our solar system.

Top candidates in this search are rocky, rather than gaseous, planets orbiting low-mass stars called M-dwarfs — easily the most common stars in the universe.

One nearby M-dwarf is TRAPPIST-1, a star about 40 light years away that hosts a system of orbiting planets under intense scrutiny in the search for life on planets orbiting stars other than the sun.

Previous research questioned the habitability of planets orbiting TRAPPIST-1, finding that intense UV rays would burn away their surface water.

That would leave the planet’s surface desiccated and, if only the hydrogen part of the water vapour molecules escapes, potentially with huge amounts of reactive oxygen that would inhibit origin-of-life chemistry.

Now, a University of Washington-led study has found that a sequence of events during the evolution of certain rocky planets orbiting M-dwarfs creates an atmosphere that would be stable over time.

Lead author Joshua Krissansen-Totton, a UW assistant professor of Earth and space sciences, said: “One of the most intriguing questions right now in exoplanet astronomy is: Can rocky planets orbiting M-dwarf stars maintain atmospheres that could support life?

“Our findings give reason to expect that some of these planets do have atmospheres, which significantly enhances the chances that these common planetary systems could support life.”

Sensitive

The James Webb Space Telescope is sensitive enough that it can observe a select few of these planetary systems.

Data coming back so far suggests that the hottest rocky planets, closest to the TRAPPIST-1 star, do lack significant atmospheres.

But the telescope has not yet been able to clearly characterise planets in the ‘Goldilocks zone’, slightly further from their star, at a distance most favourable to supporting liquid water and life.

The new study modelled a rocky planet through the course of its molten formation and cooling over hundreds of millions of years into a solid terrestrial planet.

Results showed that hydrogen or other light gases did initially escape into outer space. But for planets further away from the star, where the temperature is more moderate, hydrogen also reacted with oxygen and iron in the planet’s interior.

This produced water and other, heavier, gases, forming an atmosphere that results show is stable over time.

Results also showed that for these ‘Goldilocks zone’ planets, water rains out of the atmosphere fairly quickly, making the water less likely to escape.

Krissansen-Totton said: “It’s easier for the JWST to observe hotter planets closest to the star because they emit more thermal radiation, which isn’t as affected by the interference from the star.

“For those planets we have a fairly unambiguous answer: They don’t have a thick atmosphere.

“For me, this result is interesting because it suggests that the more temperate planets may have atmospheres and ought to be carefully scrutinised with telescopes, especially given their habitability potential.”

Conducive to life

The JWST has not yet been able to see whether the planets a little farther from the TRAPPIST-1 star have atmospheres. But if they do, that means they could have surface liquid water and a temperate climate conducive to life.

Krissansen-Totton said: “With the telescopes that we have now, the James Webb and the extremely large ground-based telescopes coming soon, we’re really only going to be able to look at a very small number of habitable zone rocky planets’ atmospheres — it’s the TRAPPIST-1 planets and a couple of others.

“Given the huge interest in the search for life elsewhere, our result suggests that it’s worthwhile investing telescope time to continue studying the habitability of these systems with the technology we have now, rather than waiting for the next generation of more powerful telescopes.”

The study is published in Nature Communications.